|

Home Boarding Licensing.
A sensible move or pointless red tape?
In February 2010, the whole dog boarding community of the borough of Wokingham, some 50 companies and individuals, let out a cry of horror as Wokingham Borough council announced its consultation around the proposed introduction of a home boarding licence for Dog Boarders.
The reason for the anguish, neighbouring Bracknell Council had introduced a similar license in 2006 which had the effect of almost eradicating the practice of home boarding in the borough.
The licence proposed set out a series of measures over 4 pages of A4. Some would argue they were sensible measures, other would argue that it was the nanny state in action, but there was an almost unanimous condemnation of one or two key clauses that would put the majority of home boarding establishments out of business overnight.
For example, one clause, which was introduced in Bracknell, proposed that only dogs from one family would be boarded at any given time (which came to be called the one dog policy). This clause alone meant that the home boarding of dogs would cease to be a business opportunity other than for those larger businesses that could employ 15 – 20 home boarders, each taking one dog (eg Barking Mad, etc).
There was also another problem that would affect the larger businesses themselves in that the requirement for a license would make the recruitment of individuals to provide boarding services on a one to one basis very difficult indeed (if not impossible). At the end of the day, the type of people who are interested in providing home boarding services on a one to one basis are earning a very low income, work casual hours and are not interested in having random inspections from the local council or paying for a local vet and councillor to inspect their premises.
In the end, the consultation process proved very useful. One councillor admitted to me that they usually get between 0 and 10 responses to any given consultation, but on the issue of home boarding, the council had been (to use their phrase) overwhelmed by over 270 angry responses.
On the day of the town hall meeting it was standing room only to hear the results of the consultation. The room was full of tension. If they had been handing out pitch forks on the door it would have been a scene from a medieval village revolt. Whilst there were some home boarders present, the majority of attendees were individuals who were simply livid with the council for attempting to dictate to them what they could and couldn’t do with their own dog.
Seldom does sense prevail in matters relating to local council affairs but I am happy to report that on this occasion, sense did prevail. Wokingham councillors listened to the huge number of responses and took note. In the end, they rescinded the one dog rule in favour of a “written permission” style of clause whereby an establishment could board more than one dog from different families as long as they had written permission (from the families) to do so.
Additionally, and some would argue quite brilliantly, Wokingham Council introduced a “de-minimis” clause meaning that until you had more than three paying guests, there was no need for a licence. Their thinking being that one or two dogs did not constitute home boarding on a commercial scale and therefore did not require regulation. This meant that companies recruiting staff to provide limited boarding services on a one to one basis could continue to do so with impunity.
All in all, the result of the consultation means that the home boarding business community in Wokingham Borough has a fighting chance of surviving in some form or another onto 2012 and beyond.
Whilst there remains the issue of inspections and the cost of the license, these should prove to be non fatal impositions and life should (for the majority at least) go on.
We are very keen to understand what your experience has been on this matter. If your boarding business (or any other part of your pet business) has been adversely affected by local authority red tape, please email us your experiences at newsletter@petsitter-software.co.uk.
With Best Regards
Richard
Richard Booty
Managing Director
Pet Software Limited
|